vendredi 18 avril 2014

L'inflation cosmologique : un amplificateur de rêve (pour détecter un graviton) quantique ?


Les électrons en chute libre rêvent-ils de gravité quantique? (3)



L'homme ne pourra (vraisemblablement) jamais détecter un graviton unique


Voici une conférence de Freeman Dyson qui porte précisément sur la possibilité de détecter un graviton, autrement dit un quantum de champ gravitationnel (et non sur la question de savoir s'il existe une théorique quantique renormalisable de la gravitation). Il y expose précisément les points suivant selon ses propres mots:


I can prove that detectors with the LIGO design, detecting gravitational waves by measuring their effects on the distance between two mirrors, cannot detect single gravitons. To reduce quantum fluctuations in the measurement of distance, the mirrors must be heavy. To make the quantum noise small enough to observe the signal from a single graviton, the mirrors must be so heavy that they collapse together into a black hole. The laws of general relativity and quantum mechanics conspire to make the measurement impossible. 




Freeman Dyson : Is a graviton detectable?  08/2013



La conjecture pessimiste de Dyson sur l'impossibilité de détecter un graviton est plus ancienne puisqu'elle remonte à 2004 au moins. Pour saisir la subtilité des problèmes physiques impliqués on peut lire cet article de Tony Rothman et Stephen Boughn qui confirme les idées de Dyson :



... we can say that to detect a single graviton was a priori going to be a difficult proposition, but it was not obvious that it was fundamentally impossible. Although, as we stated at the outset, we have found no basic principle ruling out graviton detection, reasonable physics appears to do so. Perhaps the most interesting aspect of the investigation is that it leads to some fairly subtle physics, which ... has caused significant confusion in the literature. Certainly, if a “no graviton” law appears elusive, we do feel entitled to predict that no one will ever detect one in our universe.



Tony Rothman et Stephen Boughn, Can Gravtion Be Detected ? 2006



On peut aussi découvrir l'argumentation technique de Dyson dans le texte, par exemple dans un compte-rendu de 2012 qui souligne bien les enjeux de sa problématique :



One hypothesis is that gravity is a quantum field and gravitons exist. A second hypothesis is that the gravitational field is a statistical concept like entropy or temperature, only de fined for gravitational effects of matter in bulk and not for effects of individual elementary particles. If the second hypothesis is true, then the gravitational field is not a local field like the electromagnetic field. The second hypothesis implies that the gravitational field at a point in space-time does not exist, either as a classical or as a quantum field.


Now I assert that both of the two hypotheses may or may not be experimentally testable. Analysis of the properties of graviton-detectors, following the methods of this paper, might be able to throw light on both hypotheses. Three outcomes are logically possible. If a graviton detector is possible and succeeds in detecting gravitons, then the rst hypothesis is true and the second is false. If a graviton detector is possible and fails to detect gravitons, then the rst hypothesis is false and the second is open. If a graviton detector is in principle impossible, then both hypotheses remain open. Even if their existence is not experimentally testable, gravitons may still exist.



Freeman Dyson, Is a Graviton Detectable? 06/08/2012



Heureusement, dans un lointain passé, la nature a (peut-être) fabriqué un amplificateur cosmique  


Si le graviton quantique échappe aux outils du physicien peut-être peut-il le saisir par des idées ? C'est en l'occurrence la proposition audacieuse de Lawrence M. Krauss et Franck Wilczek à travers deux courts articles dont le dernier est d'autant plus intéressant qu'il propose d'étayer son argumentation sur un résultat expérimental récent, celui de BICEP2 :


 Freeman Dyson has emphasized that no conventional experiment is capable of detecting individual gravitons. However, as we describe, if inflation occurred, the Universe, by acting as an ideal graviton amplifier, affords such access. It produces a classical signal, in the form of macroscopic gravitational waves, in response to spontaneous (not induced) emission of gravitons. Thus recent BICEP2 observations of polarization in the cosmic microwave background will, if confirmed, provide firm empirical evidence for the quantization of gravity


Lawrence M. KraussFrank WilczekFrom B Modes to Quantum Gravity and Unification of Forces, 04/2014





... cosmology provides a realistic observable that is directly tied to the quantization of gravity. Specifically, observation of a cosmological gravitational wave background associated with an inflationary phase would provide, as a bonus, compelling evidence for the quantization of the gravitational field. It does so in a way which is at least heuristically equivalent to all laboratory experiments that probe quantum phenomena–it


couples quantum mechanical phenomena to a classical detector, effectively amplifying quantum mechanical ffects so that they are classically measurable. The classical detector, in this case, is the expanding Universe.


The fact that quantization associated with gravity appears to be an essential feature of a gravitational wave background generated by inflation can be understood as follows: A period of inflation in the early universe results from a period of quasi-de Sitter expansion associated with a scalar field in an almost flat potential. If one considers a quantized approximately massless scalar field in de-Sitter space, expanded into Fourier components with quantized mode functions ... then it is straightforward to calculate the zero-point quantum fluctuations of these mode functions...


... if one treats these Fourier modes as quantum modes then there will be zero-point fluctuations in each of the two modes that can be directly derived from equation ... Once these modes leave the horizon during the Inflationary expansion, they freeze in, effectively amplifying the mode number while outside the horizon, and they return inside the horizon as a coherent superposition of many quanta, e.g. as a classical wave. These waves, originating as quantum fluctuations, then have a dimensionless power spectrum at the horizon ... The fact that this calculation relies on gravitational modes originating as quantum fluctuations strongly suggests that the effect is essentially quantum-mechanical, but that conclusion is not logically forced. After all, many – in principle, all! – classical effects can also be calculated quantum mechanically, and sometimes that approach is simpler or more direct....


Through inflation, the Universe can act effectively as a graviton detector built on an “impractical scale”. It amplifies a quantum mechanical effect to where it can be detected as a classical, observable signal, and may provide compelling empirical support for the quantization of gravity. Thus we both illustrate and transcend, rather than contradict, the arguments of T. Rothman and S. Boughn.



Lawrence M. Krauss et Franck Wilczek, Using Cosmology to Establish the Quantization of Gravity, 2013



Remarque : c'est moi qui ai mis en caractère gras certains passages. Par contre le texte souligné est une mise en exergue par les auteurs de l'article d'une hypothèse fondamentale sur laquelle repose leur argumentation.






Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire

Cher-ère lecteur-trice, le blogueur espère que ce billet vous a sinon interessé-e du moins interpellé-e donc, si le coeur vous en dit, osez partager avec les autres internautes comme moi vos commentaires éclairés !
Dear reader, the blogger hopes you have been interested by his post or have noticed something (ir)relevant, then if you are in the mood, do not hesitate to share with other internauts like me your enlightened opinion !